Comparing Oedipus and Prufrock

Everyone has at least(prenominal) one individualized flaw that someway over heralds or defeats them in a legitimate place in time. In this essay, two characters of completely different fields go let come forth be put side by side to comp be their confess sad flaws. On one hand, Sophocles Oedipus is proud, arrogant and dour while on the other hand, Eliots Prufrock is self conscious, insecure, and indecisive. While the two characters be complete polar opposites, they also dole out a devastating likeness they be paranoid and in business organization of their take in fate. Oedipus in-personity is clearly conveyed as having uppity pride and determination throughout the play.He starting time travels far from Corinth to prevent an oracles prediction that he would kill his acquire and marry his mother. He arrives in Thebes where the masses were distressed over the Sphinxs come home. Oedipus thence sets his mind on solving this riddle in which he succeeds and is awarde d the throne to Thebes. This should beat been a huge boost of federal agency for a man who was worried he would be cursed for the rest of his look. He serves as a loyal pansy for his people, seeming to want to do the the chasten way keeng for Thebes, but public lectures with such a c at a timeited attitude.In the play, right subsequently receiving news that the preceding kings killer is residing in Thebes, Oedipus states Well, I leave start afresh and once over again make dark things clear. Right decorous the concern of Phoebus, worthy thine too, for the dead I also, as is meet, lead l eradicate my guardianship to avenge this wrong to Thebes and to the God (Sophocles). With twain assurance and superiority in his voice, Oedipus throws it in Thebes face that he has saved them once before, and will do it again by bringing Laius killer to justice. He sets out on finding the person that kill King Laius and puts all of his energy, pride, and persistence into it.He acts as a great detective and follows for each one clue diligently. This helps the play revolve virtually the question of solving a offense (Rix). By putting together the pieces of the take mystery, he finally begins to questions himself about his matter in the assassination and even his own fate. Sophocles Oedipus pursues self-knowledge and at the same time resists it because it whitethorn connect him with his past (Morgen stool). He in the end finds out that he is indeed his receives killer and his mothers husband. Oedipus tragic flaws of hubris and determination lead him to fraud himself and be exiled just as e said would happen to the murderer if he was found. Unlike Oedipus, the character in T. S. Eliots Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock is timid, insecure and indecisive. throughout the poem, Prufrock is faced with a decision to progression a woman he has essential a liking to, or remain looking out a alone(predicate) window drowning his self consciousness in an ocean of self inquiry. He wants to supplicate her the overwhelming question, but rather he purposefully avoids the woman by having face-to-face detour conversations with himself about his self image. The perfect poem is laced with Prufrock asking himself questions.He asks Do I dare disturb the being? (Eliot) as if the whole world will come crashing down if he obviously talks to her. He wants to wait for the right time, but in the same thought, he knows his years are running out he mentions his bald spot and thin arms. Prufrock is so consumed with himself and how others might portray or judge him, that it is paralyzing him from social activities and gatherings. He is qualifying through a mid demeanor crisis that he may perk up brought on himself by leading an unproductive, bland spiritedness and his lack of determination and will to tilt that life may lead him into his fear of being lonely forever.Prufrock is essentially affright by women or people in general because he is ashamed of his personal appearance and monotony. One side of his character believes in the possibility of having a kindred but the side of his self doubt and pity shackles him from living the life he is clearly screaming out for (Blythe). Towards the end of the poem, he realizes that he will never summon up the courage to talk to the person he admires. He gives up on himself and becomes aware that he has worn his life asking himself if he should do the things he wanted to do instead of putting his plans to action.Where Oedipus is without a doubt expeditious, stern and decisive in his promises, J. Alfred Prufrock is deficient by being obsessed with taking his time, achromatic and unable to make a undecomposable choice even for himself. However both of these characters share a haunting similarity of fearing the realization that their lives have finally come to a particular point they have been attempting to prevent their whole life. Sometimes life presents a person with a insufficiency in personality which becomes highlighted in the play up while trying to correct that specialized trait.In the Case of Oedipus and Prufrock, their own life flaws are over exaggerated and yet serene overcorrected, in which they remain troubled with the things they shun about themselves. The two characters failed to avert a lingering curse which had been following them throughout, last sealing their fate with their own personal flaws. Works Cited Blithe, Hal and Sweet, Charlie. Eliots THE LOVE poem OF J. ALFRED PRUFROCK. The Explicator 62. 2 (2004) 108-110. literary Reference kernel Plus. Web. Eliot, T. S. The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock. The Norton founding to lit Shorter Tenth Edition. Eds. Allison Booth and Kelly J. Mays. spic-and-span York Norton, 2010. 1015-1019. Print. Morgenstern, Naomi. The Oedipus heterogeneous Made Simple. University Of Toronto Quarterly 72. 4 (2003) 777-788. Literary Reference Center Plus. Web. Rix, Robert W. Was Oedipus Framed? Orbis Litterari um 54. 2 (1999) 134. Literary Reference Center Plus. Web. Sophocles. Oedipus the King. The Norton Introduction to Literature Shorter Tenth Edition. Eds. Allison Booth and Kelly J. Mays. New York Norton, 2010.